it's a filled region that has a void in the middle which shows the elevation, if that makes sense. This is a filled region to highlight the figure ground of the drawing so it reads as an elevation not a section, as well as improving the legibility of the drawing with a heavy outline. this isn't a filled region to represent an architectural element. It wouldn't be hard to press the buttons but the time taken to draw that would be boring as fuck.Ĭalm down. A hundred+ rooms all updated, fuck doing something like that on cad. I didn't have to re-draw or coordinate shit. I dropped basically an entire school's ceiling heights by 300mm a couple weeks ago. I see another comment saying "coordinating elevations in cad takes 5 minutes". If you're doing a house or something small I don't think it's gonna benefit much. It's way cheaper to have a guy modelling it for an extra few days than finding out about it on site. You should be able to return to problems way way less if you're coordinating everything properly. I think time you spend at the desk initially isn't the only thing to consider in the time aspect. They'd run in to a problem on site and figure something out on the day. I asked an older colleague how they usedcoordinate all the services before 3D was common and he said they just didn't do it all that much. Linking in the models and reviewing in 3D is so fast. I work on commercial projects (Airports, Schools, Hospitals) and the coordination between Architecture, M&E, Structural is a huge undertaking. "but in the course of the whole project you save time!" I will now receive the typical comments which consist of variations on "you're not using it in the way it was intended" and "there's a workaround" and "but in the course of the whole project you save time!" I'm losing the joy I once had in design production, and it's really depressing. I hate working in this software yet I have no other choice. It's more like a book of stickers that don't peel off properly, and sometimes rips, and gets your hands all sticky and dirty. I'd liken Revit to an etch-a-sketch, but that's not even accurate. I think this is even reflected in our built environment. I hate that autodesk has monopolized the profession, and have single handedly reduced many of us to less nimble, fogged, stuttering designers. While there are architects clamoring for a better feature set(recent petition by ZHA and Rogers), I don't even have to go there - there are plenty of issues with just the interface I could write a thesis on. These are fundamental user interface issues, not some crazy technical challenge. If there was an equivalent of a brain fog for your hands, this is it. The joy I get from freehand sketching, or working in Rhino, or even autocad, are not there, and I feel like I'm just sitting here operating some archaic, slow machinery. I feel stunted, handicapped, and confined as I work in Revit. I'm sick of not knowing whether an element is selected or not because the highlight doesn't go away. I'm sick of the broken text box that hasn't been fixed in half a decade (you still have to backspace to activate) I'm sick of the bad ribbon interface that forces you to search out the buttons rather than typing commands (I use shortcuts heavily, but not enough commands are assignable) I'm sick of the sheer number of clicks it takes to do something so simple (count the number of keys and clicks needed to toggle reference planes). I'm sick of slowing down my keystrokes and clicks so Revit can catch up(ever try to select a hatch dropdown by typing?), I'm sick of waiting a full second every time a detail line is moved. I'm talking about the utter lack of snappiness, responsiveness, freedom, whatever you want to call it. No I'm not talking about missing functionalities(of which there are many). After 15 years of using Revit, it still feels like I'm trying to swim with one leg amputated.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |